XRP has found itself at the center of the U.S. financial spotlight following a syndicated opinion piece published by USA Today, which labeled it the “smartest digital asset to invest $500 in right now.”
The article, originally penned by analysts at The Motley Fool, makes the case that XRP’s utility in cross-border payment systems gives it an edge over more speculative cryptocurrencies. While it acknowledged that XRP’s early explosive growth has slowed—its $170 billion market cap leaving little room for parabolic rallies—the piece argued that its long-term value lies in gradual adoption and consistent real-world use.
Although stablecoins were noted as better suited for fast settlement in payments, the article suggested that XRP could still gain traction through RLUSD, a stablecoin operating partly on the XRP Ledger—even if most of its volume currently flows through Ethereum.
The op-ed’s publication triggered immediate backlash from segments of the Bitcoin community, many of whom dismissed the analysis as misleading. Critics flooded social media with rebuttals, especially after USA Today promoted the piece to its 5 million followers on X, amplifying the divide between XRP supporters and Bitcoin purists.
READ MORE:
Bitcoin Profit Supply Drops to 91%—Swissblock Flags Critical Support Range
Despite the mainstream media attention, XRP’s price action didn’t reflect bullish momentum. The token dropped to $2.75, according to CoinGecko, before posting a mild recovery—continuing its recent downward trajectory.
While the debate rages on, the article has undeniably brought XRP back into mainstream financial discourse, reigniting conversations around utility, regulation, and the future of digital payments.
Source
Kosta Gushterov
Kosta has been working in the crypto industry for over 4 years. He strives to present different perspectives on a given topic and enjoys the sector for its transparency and dynamism. In his work, he focuses on balanced coverage of events and developments in the crypto space, providing information to his readers from a neutral perspective.
